Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Robert Ames wrote: <snip
Does this indicate that Fosamax is a dangerous drug? No. That is an unethical conclusion based on poor science and the use of figures to manipulate people. What does the site say about Fosamax? Out of 1000 people who take it, 35 complain about it. 16-17 of those people stop taking it the first day. 3-4 people stop taking it/complain about it because it doesn’t work quickly enough to assuage their symptoms. Another 1-2 people stop taking it because it gave them a headache, or they thought it did. Another 2-3 people stop taking it or complain because they get a rash or other reaction to it. Another 1-2 people stop taking it or complain because they felt it gave them diarrhea. No, I’m sorry, that is not what the FDA report says. It only shows the number of complaints per symptom for the entire dataset. The number of patients complaining that Fosamax gives them headaches, diarrhea, etc. is not shown in the FDA report. In fact, if we applied those numbers, we’d have to conclude that 1.4% suffered lost their hair (alopecia).
<snip
I notice that Grey posted at 4:20 AM. This was probably just one of those bloopers that gets posted in the wee hours of the morning. I’ve done it myself, a few times.
Exactly. I did make a mistake in interpretation, which I addressed in another post. However, although the *site* does not give the numbers I listed, it is possible to take their percentages and figure out how many people who complained about a drug complained about which problem. The largest category of complaints was ineffectiveness, at a bit over 33%. So, about 1/3 of people who complain about a drug complain that it did nothing. The other two thirds of the ranked reasons given for complaints included things such as headache, gastric problems, etc. Other information on the site indicates that a good many people stop taking a drug within the first 24 hours. I think my first point is still true–the evidence on that site is useful, but not for proving that a particular drug is dangerous or for making recommendations about whether it should be on the market or not. Incorrect conclusions drawn from that information were being presented here on ASM. Also included in that point is the idea that it’s good to learn to read research and to find out for ourselves what something really says. — -~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-*~~-*~~-*~~- -Grey- -~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-*~~-*~~-*~~-
Response:
shelly (she…@rain.org) wrote:
: : Yup, posting to this newsgroup is like getting hit in a drive-by : shooting. I never said it was the 10 most "dangerous" drug list. But : Wendy said that -someone- said that, and that she was darned irritated : that someone had. So take that, you someone. : shelly My apologies to you Wendy, for my drive-by hit on you, when in fact the public record states it was Grey who made the charge that "someone" had turned the list of top 10 adverse drugs into a list of the top ten most dangerous drugs. Still looking for that "someone" who did that. shelly
Response:
Hypoint (hypo…@aol.com) wrote: : Shelly wrote:
Yup, posting to this newsgroup is like getting hit in a
: drive-by :
shooting. I never said it was the 10 most "dangerous" drug list. But
:
Wendy said that -someone- said that, and that she was darned irritated
:
that someone had. So take that, you someone.
: : Doing a powersearch in Dejanews for the period of time from jul 1 1998 thru : Aug 12 1998 I find 5 posts I made that contain the word dangerous and none of : them were about the adverse experience list, and the only one that contained : the word irritated had it as part of Shelly’s post. Wendy, you are right. It was my error to get your name mixed up with Grey, who was infact the one making the allegation. Please accept my apologies. shelly
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -she…@rain.org wrote:
Grey (Astra…@pacbell.net) wrote: : I was mainly objecting to the labeling of this list as a list of the ten : most dangerous drugs, when they are the ten most complained-about : drugs. Please note that cocaine, barbiturates, amphetamines, and : -Grey- My deepest apology to Wendy for mistating her position. I was clearly misquoting her as the public record shows. It was Grey who found that "someone" had labeled this list of top ten adverse drug reactions as the list of the ten most dangerous drugs. The search for that "someone continues." shelly
I think the post you are looking for was made under a thread called "Evista and Osteoporosis" by Robert Ames on July 22nd. The list is from "ADE Reports by Top-10 Ranked Suspect Drugs: 1996" and I quote the drugs (without the number of complaints). I printed this list because it was of personal interest to me: RuthJ Fosamax Norplant Prozac Pepcid AC Estraderm Femstat Rogaine Paragard T380A Nix Zoloft
Response:
shelly (she…@rain.org) wrote: : : Yup, posting to this newsgroup is like getting hit in a drive-by : shooting. I never said it was the 10 most "dangerous" drug list. But : Wendy said that -someone- said that, and that she was darned irritated : that someone had. So take that, you someone. : shelly My apologies to you Wendy, for my drive-by hit on you, when in fact the public record states it was Grey who made the charge that "someone" had turned the list of top 10 adverse drugs into a list of the top ten most dangerous drugs. Still looking for that "someone" who did that.
Shelly, Thanks. But I don’t need apologies. Just wanted the public record straight. Word of reminder and personal request. Grey said when she posted that night that she had been up all night with insomnia. Could we please could consider it an honest mistake and move on? Wendy hypo…@aol.com
Response:
On Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:59:38 -0700, shelly <she…@rain.org
wrote: Also on another thread. How many calories in a few teaspoons of heavy creme? Why not use it. Who says the world "accepts" that a "high-fat" diet is a current no-no? Show me the proof for anything about diet, drugs and cholesterol, especially for women.
Heh, heh — touche’ Shelly. :-) I believe that a high fat diet isn’t good for us, but you’re right — I don’t think there’s proof, yet. As for calories, the chart in my Laurel’s Kitchen cookbook gives 32 calories for a tablespoon of light cream. Heavy cream’s value is only listed by the cup — 838 calories, which if divided by 16 (approximate no. of tablespoons in a cup measurement) comes out to 52.37 calories, or 52 (rounded off). Lianne To reply by e-mail, remove "seesig." from my address. No spam, no announcements, no commercial e-mail, no mailing lists.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -shelly wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, Grey wrote: I was mainly objecting to the labeling of this list as a list of the ten most dangerous drugs, when they are the ten most complained-about drugs. Please note that cocaine, barbiturates, amphetamines, and morphine were conspiciously absent from this list…they are all probably far more dangerous than any of the drugs on the list…but, few people on them complain about them. -Grey- Who ever labeled it the 10 Most Dangerous Drugs? I know I referred to this list as the 10 most complained about drugs listed by the FDA. Or is this an example of the distortion of the record that goes on here all too frequently, and mere repetition of a charge takes on a life of its own? Like the old "telephone game" children play? Can you direct me to the post where it was claimed that the FDA List was the 10 Most Dangerous Drugs?<snip Thank you for clearing this up for me.
If you’re interested in that information, I suggest you go to Dejanews and look it up, rather than assigning this task to someone else. <snip
Also on another thread. How many calories in a few teaspoons of heavy creme? Why not use it. Who says the world "accepts" that a "high-fat" diet is a current no-no? Show me the proof for anything about diet, drugs and cholesterol, especially for women.
This newsgroup is about menopause. — -~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-*~~-*~~-*~~- -Grey- -~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-*~~-*~~-*~~-
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -On Sat, 08 Aug 1998 15:45:30 -0700, Grey <Astra…@pacbell.net
wrote: shelly wrote: On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, Grey wrote: I was mainly objecting to the labeling of this list as a list of the ten most dangerous drugs, when they are the ten most complained-about drugs. Please note that cocaine, barbiturates, amphetamines, and morphine were conspiciously absent from this list…they are all probably far more dangerous than any of the drugs on the list…but, few people on them complain about them. -Grey- Who ever labeled it the 10 Most Dangerous Drugs? I know I referred to this list as the 10 most complained about drugs listed by the FDA. Or is this an example of the distortion of the record that goes on here all too frequently, and mere repetition of a charge takes on a life of its own? Like the old "telephone game" children play? Can you direct me to the post where it was claimed that the FDA List was the 10 Most Dangerous Drugs?<snip Thank you for clearing this up for me. If you’re interested in that information, I suggest you go to Dejanews and look it up, rather than assigning this task to someone else.
So you made a baseless allegation, then? I don’t get the opportunity to check deja news as often as I used to, but I was wondering what you were referring to so I took the time to search for this. I can’t find where it was referred to as the ten "most dangerous" drugs… Maybe it wasn’t. Lianne To reply by e-mail, remove "seesig." from my address. No spam, no announcements, no commercial e-mail, no mailing lists.
Response:
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Lianne McNeil wrote:
If you’re interested in that information, I suggest you go to Dejanews and look it up, rather than assigning this task to someone else.
Wendy
So you made a baseless allegation, then? I don’t get the opportunity to check deja news as often as I used to, but I was wondering what you were referring to so I took the time to search for this. I can’t find where it was referred to as the ten "most dangerous" drugs… Maybe it wasn’t. Lianne
Yup, posting to this newsgroup is like getting hit in a drive-by shooting. I never said it was the 10 most "dangerous" drug list. But Wendy said that -someone- said that, and that she was darned irritated that someone had. So take that, you someone. shelly
Response:
Shelly wrote:
Yup, posting to this newsgroup is like getting hit in a
drive-by
shooting. I never said it was the 10 most "dangerous" drug list. But Wendy said that -someone- said that, and that she was darned irritated that someone had. So take that, you someone.
Doing a powersearch in Dejanews for the period of time from jul 1 1998 thru Aug 12 1998 I find 5 posts I made that contain the word dangerous and none of them were about the adverse experience list, and the only one that contained the word irritated had it as part of Shelly’s post. Wendy hypo…@aol.com
Response:
Grey (Astra…@pacbell.net) wrote:
: I was mainly objecting to the labeling of this list as a list of the ten : most dangerous drugs, when they are the ten most complained-about : drugs. Please note that cocaine, barbiturates, amphetamines, and : -Grey- My deepest apology to Wendy for mistating her position. I was clearly misquoting her as the public record shows. It was Grey who found that "someone" had labeled this list of top ten adverse drug reactions as the list of the ten most dangerous drugs. The search for that "someone continues." shelly
Response:
On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, Grey wrote:
I was mainly objecting to the labeling of this list as a list of the ten most dangerous drugs, when they are the ten most complained-about drugs. Please note that cocaine, barbiturates, amphetamines, and morphine were conspiciously absent from this list…they are all probably far more dangerous than any of the drugs on the list…but, few people on them complain about them. -Grey-
Who ever labeled it the 10 Most Dangerous Drugs? I know I referred to this list as the 10 most complained about drugs listed by the FDA. Or is this an example of the distortion of the record that goes on here all too frequently, and mere repetition of a charge takes on a life of its own? Like the old "telephone game" children play? Can you direct me to the post where it was claimed that the FDA List was the 10 Most Dangerous Drugs? I would hate to think that you were some how implying that I was making this claim as I was the one who mentioned this list again, after Robert’s original posting of it. Thank you for clearing this up for me. What struck me was how many of the drugs were prescribed more to women out of the top 10. But that could be because women may complain more readily, where as men may just stop taking the drug. Also it is interesting that often the placebo is a milk-sugar (lactose) pill which can explain why so many of the placebo takers register in with the intestinal ailments, many are lactose intolerant. Do you suppose this is intentionally done to skew some observations about placebos? Why not just use a sucrose pill? Also on another thread. How many calories in a few teaspoons of heavy creme? Why not use it. Who says the world "accepts" that a "high-fat" diet is a current no-no? Show me the proof for anything about diet, drugs and cholesterol, especially for women. shelly
Response:
In article <35CAE3FC.637FF…@pacbell.net
, Grey <Astra…@pacbell.net wrote: Exactly. I would add my encouragement that people learn how to draw conclusions from statistical information that is presented. The information on that site doesn’t have Fosamax leading a list of dangerous drugs. It has Fosamax receiving the most complaints about drugs, which is still only 3.5% of complaints about all drugs. This means that out of 1000 people taking Fosamax, 35 complain about it.
Just a question for clarification, Grey — wouldn’t the "3.5 percent of complaints about all drugs" statement actually translate to "Out of 1000 people complaining about the drugs they take, 35 complained about Fosamax?" That seems to me a subtle but important difference from the way you put it. (I really don’t know or care a thing about Fosamax, per se; this is just part of my lifelong effort to wrap my brain around statistical information). –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Pat Kight wrote:
In article <35CAE3FC.637FF…@pacbell.net, Grey <Astra…@pacbell.net wrote: Exactly. I would add my encouragement that people learn how to draw conclusions from statistical information that is presented. The information on that site doesn’t have Fosamax leading a list of dangerous drugs. It has Fosamax receiving the most complaints about drugs, which is still only 3.5% of complaints about all drugs. This means that out of 1000 people taking Fosamax, 35 complain about it. Just a question for clarification, Grey — wouldn’t the "3.5 percent of complaints about all drugs" statement actually translate to "Out of 1000 people complaining about the drugs they take, 35 complained about Fosamax?" That seems to me a subtle but important difference from the way you put it.
Yes, I think that is right. I wrote that post towards the end of a bout of insomnia–I was probably running a few cells short of a full charge. By the way, this morning beginning at one I watched a great HBO movie about a women’s choir started by internment camp prisoners in Sumatra during WWII, then watched, "Silkwood," then read a chapter or so of "A Passage to India," then jumped on the Internet when I got tired of flopping around the bed looking for passive entertainment.
(I really don’t know or care a thing about Fosamax, per se; this is just part of my lifelong effort to wrap my brain around statistical information).
I don’t either, and I asked at the nursing department at work and they had no clue, either! I was mainly objecting to the labeling of this list as a list of the ten most dangerous drugs, when they are the ten most complained-about drugs. Please note that cocaine, barbiturates, amphetamines, and morphine were conspiciously absent from this list…they are all probably far more dangerous than any of the drugs on the list…but, few people on them complain about them. — -~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-*~~-*~~-*~~- -Grey- -~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-*~~-*~~-*~~-
Response:
Hypoint wrote:
Thank you. Found it. It would be interesting to see a cross correlation with # of prescriptions for the year.
I would like to see this, too. What I *did* see there was a percentile ranking of drugs by number of ADE (adverse drug experiences). For Fosamax, the MOST COMPLAINED ABOUT DRUG… the number of ADE complaints was 3.5% THREE AND ONE-HALF PERCENT. That’s percentage of all complaints made about all drugs, not even percentage of people on Fosamax who complain. This is a great example of how it’s possible to skew statistics without even changing the numbers. "Fosamax is the MOST COMPLAINED ABOUT DRUG ON THE MARKET!" "Fosamax is responsible for 3.5% of all drug complaints, and is the drug with the most reported adverse reactions, the largest of which is probably that it doesn’t work as well as people had hoped." Both these statements are true. I checked out some more of the information on that site, and I found that there are breakdowns for the type of complaints and the duration of complaints. The overwhelming majority of complaints were during the first day of taking any medication. The reason for complaint that presented most often (10% of cases) was that the drug didn’t affect symptoms, i.e., "didn’t work." Also presented on that site was information that showed that repeat occurrences were not applicable 99% of the time. This means that people have an adverse effect, then stop taking the medication.
Re Estraderm. Since Rashes / Skin adverse effects was relatively high for hormones / synthetics I would expect there was a significant number of reactions to the adhesive used.
I agree, and I also think it should be noted that "hormones" means ALL drugs in that class, including drugs such as Prednisone. I have had to take Prednisone for asthma; it is an awful drug. The side effects are terrible. Still, if the only thing that helps one to breathe… One of its side effects is rashes and skin disturbances.
It is an interesting site. I would encourge people to browse it to put quotes about information on it into perspective.
Exactly. I would add my encouragement that people learn how to draw conclusions from statistical information that is presented. The information on that site doesn’t have Fosamax leading a list of dangerous drugs. It has Fosamax receiving the most complaints about drugs, which is still only 3.5% of complaints about all drugs. This means that out of 1000 people taking Fosamax, 35 complain about it. According to information given at the site, probably the majority of these complaints are that the medication doesn’t work (or, since the majority of complainants stop taking the medicine within the first day, it means that the majority of people complaining about Fosamax complain because they take a dose and it doesn’t "work," i.e., they don’t feel better). The issue here might be that the medication doesn’t work fast enough. The overwhelming reason people give for complaining about a drug? Whole-body discomfort, i.e., they just don’t feel good on the drug. Besides the drug just plain not working (or not working fast enough), the next reasons for stopping appear to deal with side effects…headache (3.2% of all complaints), rash/skin reaction (4.8%), diarrhea (1.5%). Does this indicate that Fosamax is a dangerous drug? No. That is an unethical conclusion based on poor science and the use of figures to manipulate people. What does the site say about Fosamax? Out of 1000 people who take it, 35 complain about it. 16-17 of those people stop taking it the first day. 3-4 people stop taking it/complain about it because it doesn’t work quickly enough to assuage their symptoms. Another 1-2 people stop taking it because it gave them a headache, or they thought it did. Another 2-3 people stop taking it or complain because they get a rash or other reaction to it. Another 1-2 people stop taking it or complain because they felt it gave them diarrhea. What these numbers say (I rounded to avoid having .5 people, etc.) is that of 1000 people taking Fosamax, 35 people have problems. 11 of these people have problems that are not life threatening in the least. Three or four of those people will stop taking Fosamax the first day. 1-2 more will stop within the first week, and another 3-5 will stop taking it within the first month. THAT IS ALL THOSE NUMBERS SAY!!!!! These aren’t "dangerous," i.e., life-threatening reasons to stop taking a drug. It’s simply people’s preferences based on drug effectiveness versus uncomfortable side effects. It’s ridiculous to conclude from data like these that Fosamax is a harmful or dangerous drug. I just chose the first drug on the list and crunched some numbers. I encourage everyone else to go to this site and crunch the numbers for yourselves vis-a-vis hormone therapy. I do agree with the person who said that this group is a far cry from a peer-reviewed board. This group is full of people who want to sell you something. It may be their yam cream…or it may be their ideology. THINK for yourselves. The yam creamers aren’t the only ones on this group who don’t know squat about science and who are peddling crap. Fear tactics aren’t the exclusive domain of the pharmaceutical companies. — -~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-*~~-*~~-*~~- -Grey- -~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-~~*~~-*~~-*~~-*~~-
Response: