Question:
On 27 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words:
than with a wall. But you see, all that time, as a healer, I had worked with him on removing the wall, precisely. Yet free will is what counts
Perhaps he felt more vulnerable than he wished without that wall.
case, it was just friendship. But t him any friendship that he woudl allow himself to "feel" would start creating a need that was beyond his control, one of intimacy and yet one of total phobia of it that woudlo grow exponentially faster than the wish to allow someone close to even remain
I have experienced that fear in many of my recent relationships. I have extreme difficulty releasing the "reins" and just enjoying the "ride".
In the past, when he did the exact same thign to women who got too close to him, who somehow sometimes, if rare, happened to get through his wall, and that he ejected in similar ways, sort of punishign them for being genuinely carign and trustable, (sic, else they woudl not make it through
That I have a difficult time understanding. Punishment for caring? Unless, perhaps, he viewed it as punishment for pretense of caring. If I sense a pretense, that tends to anger me. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
"…and if I show you my dark side Will you still hold me tonight And if I open my heart to you Show you my weak side What will you do? Will you sell the story to the Rolling Stone? Would you take the children away And leave me alone Or smile in reassurance as you whisper down the phone Would you send me packing? Or woudl you take me home? Thought I oughta bare my bnaked feelings Thought I oughta turn the curtain down I heald the blade in trembling hands Prepared to make it but…. Just then the phoen rang… I’ll never have the nerve to make the final cut…" (Pink Floyd, Final Cut) Man, how well that describes this narissist fear of showign the real self, of beign sooo close to show thereal person, the real slim shady;-), holding their breath as if it was holding a blade on their wrost so great the fear for them is, then jumping on any exit out, be it " just then the phone rang", to then hit their ehad on The Wall (sic) and say "I’ll never have the nerves to make the final cut". I used to read this tuen as if it was written with a thought for suicide. Now in what light it apears to me….Pfft. But if you read the words in that way, how exactly it it is. Sad to knwo a friend hurts that much and by their own doing, but a doing inspired by so much fear….A fear they have at the occasion of you, and then hold you accountable for….to then go lick their wounds and flageollate themself about it for years in their basement….
I have done that on occasion in the "basement" of my mind. I don’t know yet whether I still have that tendency, because I haven’t had anyone get close enough to me to stir up those kinds of feelings.
I don’t decide another’s intentions either. All I can do is note what it seems like to me at a given time. Same here. But I am odd. I even allow fully that this might be how *I* read it and how it seems to *me* ***at that given time**, which means it can be completely other. After all, how often in life did we say soemthign another did not get for what it meant nor why, where they interpreted it completely other than it ever was? I donlt think it soemthign elxclusive
I have lost a few friends who made gross misinterpretations of what I had said. They refused to hear any explanation I wanted to give.
But woudl I see or be told I have a worng impression in this or that, I woud make abstraction of not only that impression but every little thing that lead me to buldign that impression, after namign them to the toehr. Then whoosh. The facts woudl stay, the impression all removed.
Most of my wrong impressions are favorable. Usually they lead me to believe something positive that isn’t really there. The upshot of that simply is that I tend to subdue my enthusiasm about certain things because I think it may be nothing more than my imagination.
As an adult I started thinking it woudl be wiser of me to give it a chance anyway. Now that I look back on my adult life, I seriously wonder about what giving twenty thousand chances lead to. Just a lot of wated time so far, and comms dyign anyway out of some assumption built and established…that t be in the third email or in the 30,000th, it is just as bad, eh:) And then for event number 30,001. ;-) Hm? Can you explain what you emant here a bit? Not used to your way o thinking yet, so can;t follow what you eman here. If you emant here livign the same event a 30,0001st time, can be.
It’s all numbers, and it’s all repetitive. ;-)
But at the same rate as anyoen else I woudl say. Save that healers dontl walk away as fast as others from the ones in need of help;-). In that they meet more wounded ones. Or the exact same amount, but create deep friendships with the wounded ones where others just walk away and moan they got no friends;-). We end up with no one lifetiem friend. A healer’s life is a hard oen to share. We got a song about "It;s not easy to live with me", and I foten sing it almost giggling so much it fits me:).
That quite easily applies to me as well, even though I’m not a healer.
Late for work, darn it, gotta go.
The curse of having to scrape for money. We are all plagued with it.
Me nad babbling. atch ya later, Must really run. Argh.
Just walk real fast. ;-) — KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
Response:
KrosRogue (m…@privacy.net) writes:
On 27 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words: than with a wall. But you see, all that time, as a healer, I had worked with him on removing the wall, precisely. Yet free will is what counts Perhaps he felt more vulnerable than he wished without that wall.
Definitely. Such was it known to be by him already and by me too. Which is why I imagined it never woudl happen, cause we both knew and cause it then was strictly said to b friendship and always understood as such. I then thought it could not apply. But h made it apply. He invented love anywhere between us, both by sayign such words himself and then by claiming he never did and that *I* was in love with him therefore *he* had to kick me out of the wall (ggggggrrrr. Giomme any truth, never li9e, and never affirm for me about my won feelings against all I say and show!:(). But yes, definitely, it all had to do with narissists needing a wall cause of hat they fear you will find inside: zilch of what they show outside, as they only are mirroring and pleasing others, playing an act all the time, nevber being the,self, for not having a darn self to be to start with. He would have had to elarn to rhow one. Mothers are involved a lot in narcissist life. The closer he allowed me in as a friend the more frquent the use fo the word "Mother" this and "Mopther" that was. Up to a point where I at a point threw that it all reminded me of Norman Bates, this "Mother" here and there stuff. Bates was one dangerous mad man, where some narcisists get to act it out that way, if that was not my friend’s doings in his past at all. But you see, Mother suggested to him to have another female friend of his help him rid of "gly me" in love with him (eeew) when "he was not", as mother wanted him to marry this other friend, see, regardless fo the fact he never loved her and coudl nto stand her nor feel attracted to ehr cause of her excessive weight, and also cause she wanted intimacy which freaked him out, iof course and made him throw her away real far. But "Mother" wanted him to marry that oen as "Mother" coudl feel she still had control over her boy;s love for her, over that of his loive for any other woman, see? Snd that friendship of ours was gettign to feel dnagerous to "Mother" I woudl dare say. It was very very strange. We had kidded in the forst days we talked where he had told me of his never really havign had a date with psettign a date in four eyars later in time: I needed soemoen to come wiht me to my sonsl graduation. And sicne we did not know ach other at all yet, it remained in the background as a sort of funny moment:). Me askign him for a date in four yars, but just to accmpany me, not as in romance. Took him the four years or so to get used to the idea where I yet never mentioned it again and then asked 8 months ahead of the grad time what of it. To my susprise his words were isnatntlaneously "just give me the date and I will be there:)". Hey, he trusted me and all, neat!:). That was when Mother started pullign the reins tighter. In all his childhood and even toddler’s years, he was Mother;s support. His words were that eh woudl even listen to her and offer help as he coudl when she had bad times with dad, as dad and hsi other brother were cats and dogs for beign too alike he said. Where h was the eldest by a few years only, and the braion kid of the family, her pride and joy but also her support. See, her second had a disease they treated with medicine he was allergic to as a kid and that created conmplicatiosn where he suffered a markedmental development on the slow side. He grew up both feelign the pressure on him to shwo the family’s offsprings were so able and all, and feelign guilty cause he coudl win at all games with his brother of course….Where he felt guilty for beign smarter…And was made to be his btoher’s keeper in soek ways, but most of all his mom’s consolation in more ways. I was flabergasted when I dfoudn thate xcat description of variosu scenarios where they noticed narcissism developing cause of the mom then giving the nromal child too little latitude to be himself, showign them to ahve to be considerately"slower" for their brother to nto be sad and so on, e5c, etc, where yet they also demanded a sort of defending the family’s honnor with theior bright offsring…and where the mom then falls back on givign the kid needing more assitance exacty that, and the oen that needs less exactly less, and tryign to yet overcompensate. The moms often will fall resting on the normal offsprign for their support,as it is a heavy duty thing for parents to live, taking care of a mentally handicapped child….So he was the oen takign care of moimmy when the tensiosn ebtween moma nd dad were too high. Consoling mom and more often than not in that playign the dad’s role. The dad and other brother woudl fight a lot beign stubborn, So is he, I must say and that he says openly, beign known to eb stubborn. But the way that I am, I;d not play his stubborn game of arguing and when is aw he was playoign argyuign for the ehck of arguing, I;d just say "Okay!:)" and that woudl titl him completely and force him to fidn other ways than this old game he was good at, creatign argumentshe knew exactly eld tow aht, heheeheh:). Thsi absence of conflict I woudl say now in retrospect amde him lost a bit. He actually ahd needed to invent some!!:) Theya re known to reinvent and rewrite history, narcissist, Anythign that fots their inner cofnort the ebst will be it and change the next time without them beign bothered by the inconsistencies. Anyway. "other" becaem omnipresent on the phoen and even doubled her visits to her son as the friendship ggot to develop into one heck of a trust adn trustworthy one on BOTH sides. I;d sayt hat Mother feared losign her control and love source from her bo-bioy, see? He ahd this immense love for his mom, nice and all, and yet this beign so annoyed by her at tiems for her tellign him to love this other gal he felt nothign for. "Mother" wanted him to marry ehr as exactly,s he knew I guess eh did not lovre her much and woudl then not deprive mommy of anything, perfect match she then foudn it for him. To me it was liek ‘But if you donlt love her, why on earth shoudl you do that???". He was made to beleivfe she was the only woman that wodule ver love him. "MNother" raised him to believe in Destiny and Fate, you see, where well, fate had it it was her, and that was that to Mother, whichw as at tiems seemign to amek sense to him, until he woudls ee her again and woudl ahve a fit inside of immense frustration, unabel to fidn hismelf attarcted to her even to please Mother! Uncosnciously, I;d bet that ahd Mother taken her nose out of it, he;d have had no problemo. But to love soemoen when Mother says so is soemthign else, eh.Hmmm. True, in that, Mother kept him away form that one woman at the same time, Everythign is double and confused and that si what makes the kids develop into narcissism unable to know where their eprson starts and ends, and where mommy starts and ends, with the mom;s cicrumstanmces makign it go on thsi way…. He moved ina dofferent town. Ihn the alst while where we talked, Mother had visited him. Like the time before when she had he was again wodnerign why he ever moved away from "the family". Sayign he thinks it had been to becoem independant from them, adding "like that was gonna work, eh". Well, no kidding, Mother woudl need to learn to let the reins loose and that her son is not her proert nor anyoen else’s but HIS OWN. That si the very thing narcissists never coudl elarn causeof their mom and thus never coudl assume their own real life and choices about. While he sees Mother as God, I tend to think og ""Mother"" as his demon. The day the voice in his head would have mom’s voice, maybe it woudl all blow up OR maybe it woudl be a day of immense realization. Most narcissist have a voice in their head tellign them that this is the right code of honnor. Which the eprson then lives by, havign none in their own self they ever coudl develop, thanks to "Mother". He had such a voice and he never hid it. He gave it a name to, where he smiled whenh I gave hima nickname that was a combination of the voice ’s name and his own. That he coudl deal with more than beign sen for only one OR the other, I think. In thealst while he removed that conbination fo nickanems he ahd used for his email name sicne I hada named him that. To go to his usual name. The voice was growign louder, as mom’s visits doubled…For a short time, he had made the voice be mine. That freaked me out, I must say, as that was NOT good for a healing, it shoudl not be. But like a psy sees some patients transfer onto them before they can make the transition to the world, I woudl sort of stand by waitign to see what woudl ahppen next. But next Mother felt she was losing control and went to secure with many phone calsl a week. Many visits, was it three anounced, suddenly, and even sending hsi dad when she coudl not eb there….He woudl nto be left to think for hismelf by himself. Mother woudl see to it. After her visits he woudl be abck to square oen: it was destiny and fae and he ewas doomed, the only women he woudl ever be loved by was that one he coudl nto stand, etc. Mother had said so of course in not so many words, just pullign te right strings and asking "are you sure?" about hsi saying that eh did NOT love her, exasperated. Just that was enough to send him into chaos and give hima feel that thatw as what Mother wanted, say. For a secodn tiem he then tried a romantic soemthign with that woman. Invtign her for Vla3entine’s day. Only he felty tremendous guotl for soem reason, and did nto tell me….He probably felt double in even hsi own voice’s orders about whats houdl be duty and ho0nnor and not…. He tried to balance it by comeing to visit … read more »
Response:
On 23 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words:
I yet know that time has to pass before I really know how I want to deal with what, or if I even really want to change anythign about that on my side. I mena, I allow as I said tyhat I am still under rebuilding mode, and not yet there…
The fact that I too am under a rebuilding mode perhaps contributes to some of my misunderstandings as well.
I refuse to get bogged down by what seems to me to be almost an intentional misunderstanding. I don’t decide for others what their intentions are, so I can not say when it is intentional, unless it really would be blatantly done where no oen on earth coudl see it any other way than in bad will, say. But there can be a ton of things behind what yet seems like or even is bad will, there again…
I don’t decide another’s intentions either. All I can do is note what it seems like to me at a given time.
As an adult I started thinking it woudl be wiser of me to give it a chance anyway. Now that I look back on my adult life, I seriously wonder about what giving twenty thousand chances lead to. Just a lot of wated time so far, and comms dyign anyway out of some assumption built and established…that t be in the third email or in the 30,000th, it is just as bad, eh:)
And then for event number 30,001. ;-)
How else can I interpret such a response? Well, I would ask the person what they meant by that. Soem will take a malicious pleasure in saying "read it starting by the forst word and ending with the last", or such things and not answer you at all.
Hey, that wasn’t malicious. That was just a continuation of what turned out to be a very bad joke. ;-)
Makes it even tougher then as if I then try and check and give feedback sayign I am not sure how to read somethign they wrote, nor how to "interpret it", and they answer this way, well, ladeeda…That much for being alone in giving feedback and tryign to amke sure *I* do not assume, eh.
I am just a wee bit curious about what would have resulted if you had read the rest of it. ;-)
Makes it feel like one way comm. which coems back to a-communication, at least from where I stand, then…The other might feel they communicate fine, but I scratch my ehad then….
Well, if there is anything I can do to confuse you, just let me know and I’ll be more than happy to oblige. ;-)
Anyway. I’ll end up finding how I want to deal with that type of emails and seign if I want to change anythign to the old way or what. I already have enough rebuilding to do without having to rebuild from some new demolition stuff on top of it, I guess:)
KABOOM!!! ;-) — KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
Response:
KrosRogue (m…@privacy.net) writes:
On 23 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words: I yet know that time has to pass before I really know how I want to deal with what, or if I even really want to change anythign about that on my side. I mena, I allow as I said tyhat I am still under rebuilding mode, and not yet there… The fact that I too am under a rebuilding mode perhaps contributes to some of my misunderstandings as well.
Perhaps we both are somehwat "self-protective" at this time, or whatever other sort of reaction to some past experience we each had. I know as I said that I am not "there" yet. Sometimes, some things in life happen in such an absolute "uncalled for" way, and so suddenly, that even the sense of closure that would help is not there, nothing transitional having been there, no event (at least none known to me) -that most likely would have helped the one subjected to unwarranted ways and judgements to get back on their feet faster. Perhaps it is the way of those who want to try and keep somethign vague by purpose, in case they later would change their mind, where they then would think of tagging anything to try and explain whatever occured, so as to try and justify it. But perhaps it is just the way of the narcissit ones, just never wanting to give any reason nor let anything real show, so as to try and look good still even in the worse they can do and did to a human being and friend. The way they build wonderful friendships, out of this world, then destroy them in one fraction of an instant, shattering all of it in one shot in such horrible ways that make it a "never come back" for the one it is done to just is beyond words. And of course all that pain is given ONLY to those they feel got closer to them than the average person. Usually someoen they never thought they could want to feel close to, where they then did not build their wall up against that. Those were in fact the very words my friend had about it all. That he had not expected I coudl ever "get in" as he called it, but that somehow I had gotten through his wall and reached in, "touched him" ""inside"", where he took a forst two month break of no longer giving news after an initial game playng of tagging things on me from absolutely nowhere. Just like building a wall after the "fact", say…I let him the time, in case he would be unable to fucntion otherwise than with a wall. But you see, all that time, as a healer, I had worked with him on removing the wall, precisely. Yet free will is what counts with me and no healing is ever doen without the other wishing it, wantign it and agreing to it. I respect no as much as I respect yes, that of others like my own. He of course had wished the wall down, suffering at seign his own self hurt others as he had said he did in the past. In our case, it was just friendship. But t him any friendship that he woudl allow himself to "feel" would start creating a need that was beyond his control, one of intimacy and yet one of total phobia of it that woudlo grow exponentially faster than the wish to allow someone close to even remain close "inside him". His only way then is to blow these persons to pices so that they hurt way too much to stay, and more than just hurt, are told things that they will respect, or at least that he knew I would: anytime he woudl say or act "go away", as he knew for my having said so, would be when I would walk away. Cause he feared aandonment liek mad too, where that was said in his period of fearing abandonment like mad, after he realized I had somehow gotten closer, through the wall. As I worked with the healing and as I made it not so much through the wall as let him decide if he would make an openign in his wall of defense and narcissism or not, man, was it ugly, if I yet coudol see the beuty of it for knowing what was hapening: his fear being immense and making him try and blast me away. I stood still then as that was saying "I am ot sure I want to remove the wall anymore". The wall was NOT being removed for me. But for him, and for him to meet some gal his age, to trust it coudl happen, as he woudl see that life was not so bad with the wall having an opening.Parallely, odd transfers started. They were understandable too: a long time friend he knew he never woudl love and was never attracted to, never said oen good word of, he sort of mislead into thinking he felt closer to, as a sort of exit door to the openign in the wall, as he feared the attachment to me and how it might be if he let me in by tearign the wall down himself. So he sort of played it with one foot outside the wall, the other very secured and securing the entire wall, inside the wall. That was still his free will. When I saw that he went as far as to lie to the other about me, and start tarshing me with even his family members, I coudl see that the odds were that he woudl play closing the wall up, or closing ME out. That was sad but did not mean it coudl not be beneficial to him in the haling, He coudl keep "the psy" out, say, so long as he did not wall his *own self* IN. I knew it coudl cost the friendship, and knew that as soon as the wall woudl be down, he woudl be runnign to find someone to hopefully not too fast, out of fear of it not lasting, tie the knot. But when e added to the trawshign me with friends and family the telling me he would be in love with the one person he built the wall about intially, I knew he was in what they call narcissist injury….Backing up all the way and ready to kill so to speak t safegard his own self from his own fear. Anyone else’s pain or fears then woudl not matter anymore. Habits die hard;-). Yet I knew and still know and will always know that that openign there was, as scary as it felt to him, will be one he will remember and will retry in time on his own, and one that, if he just wills it to fall, will make the wall vanish in no time. He NOW then has the real choice he did not ave before, the fear not allowign it, a real phobia, of either havign a wall up and no one in his life, not even a real friend, as those woudl feel too dnagerously "close" to his immense protection mechanisms, OR to break the wall down and discover how life really was. From the start, I knew that usually that means I am out of the pitcure for good. I had let him knwo that wayyyy in adance and he had sid that he woudl never let a friend go for such a reason as it woudl be one great thign to have achieved. But eh. The healer knew better;-). Yet know better as we may….A healer may also die for a real friend inside, one that woudl exactly happen to remain a friend after a healing… For some reason, it just never happens. And yet is uite understandable. What is less is the quality of a human being that person was, and the uality of the friendship that was, and how, as I gave the ehaling and friendship and healing love knowign of the odds of being completely "forgotten" afterwards, doign this selflessly then, how the otehr can just press eject and just treat you liek trash to eject you overnight. All they woudl ahev to do is, as I told him , say "Be gone" and I woudl be. The pain is not a requirement to respectign free will for me, doh:). In the past, when he did the exact same thign to women who got too close to him, who somehow sometimes, if rare, happened to get through his wall, and that he ejected in similar ways, sort of punishign them for being genuinely carign and trustable, (sic, else they woudl not make it through that wall ever anyway), in the apst he then woudl suffer a narcissist injry and hate himself to bits for hwo he acted liek a complete jerk, cruel to an nth degree in how unwarratned and how "played" it allw as for his sole self to fee safe and no longer afraid, where he woudl then stay in his basement and hate himself for YEARS, sort of making his own self a martyr, punishgign his own self for what he did. My only hope is that this time, he did not play that, or that it will not have alsted years at all, given that we were only FRIENDS, and that he saw that HE opened the wall without it havign been at all out of secual interest for once in his life. The only other times he let a crack in that wall was by sexual interest. This time he got confused, as usually when there is that opening, women got that close out of personal interest or sexual interest, wehre this time, thhere was none, but where in his fear it was easier for him to play the only way he knew to: as if it was by self interest others did it, so that he coudl feel justified to play his own self interest….and to be a complete cruel jerk at it, i.e. unjustofied and unwarranted completely. Which was always what he did to rebuild the wall real fast with anyoen that got closer. But this time, he will remember that friend I was that never did him wrong, like all the others in that, as none of those he allowed """too close"" ever did him wrong –which he is acutely aware of and tortured himselfabout for having hurt poele that never hurt oen soul on earth, since 7 years when I ran into him. This time I can only hope that all that he learned as we exchanged, and the way out I already built for him to follow woudl he build a wall again, offered to him in chit chat about his "depression", with steps and hwo to do them and why and all that, which rmeain written and availabel to him, I can only hope that in sort of "honnor" oif the great friend he had and will know too well he hurt so unwarrantedly, he will use that and pull himself out of this stupid bnarcissist injury mode. The last thign I did before the eship stopped was ask him a copy of those steps out to keep in case of future need elsewhere" I said. That then showed me he still had them and refreshed his memory about havign those. And my words also that were that as much as he thougth he played the same thign again and wanted to go lick his own self infliceted … read more »
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -KrosRogue (m…@privacy.net) writes:
On 22 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words: Ensuring that one really understood well, rather than jump to conclusions and stcik to those forever without any reality check, can make exchanges excruciatingly heavy and painful at times. This has been a problem for me on occasion, both in writing and in conversing. I would say something that would inadvertently trigger a response of anger or vehemently irrational defensiveness toward something that had no direct bearing on what I meant. At that point, the exchanges would degenerate from communication to attacks, accusations, or silence. All this would occur without any attempt on the other person’s part to even try to comprehend whatever idea I was trying to convey. I truly have quite a bit of difficulty understanding these idiotic responses.
I might understand them without seing much of a point to go on at time,s as they excatly say how one deals with problems or is unable of dialogue when their own feelings/insecurities are at play. I used to go on anyway, telling msyelf that once they;d know me they would see there is none of that ion my had and so on. Only to wste 4 years or so, seing the same occur after it did not show its nose for ages, say, and bringign it back to square minus one…. By now, I dunno yet how to do what about that type of miscomm whrn it happens. I donlt want to judge a person on a possible occasional bad mood due to illness or tiredness or whatever that would only be a once in a decade thing and just happened to fall on "me". After all, it canm happen to me too, and I’d hope another would try and just go on and see without judging too fast. And yet that was what I did all the tiem for very poor results in the end. Makes one wonder then what the use of trying is… But of course, after the bad experience I had too recently still, I allow that this might make me still see things in a self-protective way, where I yet exactly do not want to build a wall cause someone turned on a dime… But there are other types of ""exchanges"" that also get me to wonder what I coudl try instead of going on kindly. Kindness always worked in the medium or long rrun to make the other see better, but it can be one long run, like two years of prejudices that oen might finally get over and correct as they know me, say, where by that time another oen somewhere has their own type of fit and belligerant ways. Even of they too in the longer turn will see better, it makes it so there woudl always be one or two at it in the background, which gets just nborignly repetitive, to put it this way. I yet know that time has to pass before I really know how I want to deal with what, or if I even really want to change anythign about that on my side. I mena, I allow as I said tyhat I am still under rebuilding mode, and not yet there…
This in turn can lead to the one feeling like they are completely misread not putting as much effort in how the express what, in time, since they get the feeling it will be interpreted by the previously twisted out of any reality context fast judgements, and will not be see for what it says no matter how clearly they woudl express what they mean. If I get the feedback I outlined above, I give it up for a lost cause.
At that rate, I’d have done it last week in a given case. Someoen jumped to conclusions about soemthign I replied to th4em, without checkign with me about anything, and added very bad mood cracks and comments that exactly made me think "aw, man, so tired of that…People soemtimes get upset at nothing. Me too, but I mena, must it require insults and value judgements and the likes? Can’t they ask instead of always jump on their high rabbed horses, sort of thing?;-) And if somethign I said bugged them, can they not allow me the same as I do them, the possibility it is a once in a while and more rare than otherwise, etc? Else I get to feel like it is only workign both ways when I put in the effort one way…
I refuse to get bogged down by
what seems to me to be almost an
intentional misunderstanding.
I don’t decide for others what their intentions are, so I can not say when it is intentional, unless it really would be blatantly done where no oen on earth coudl see it any other way than in bad will, say. But there can be a ton of things behind what yet seems like or even is bad will, there again… As in the case of those that would immediately start on a belligerant tone and on attacks that woudl after a year or two realize they had it all wrong in their mind about me, where if there were attacks and all that, they rpecisely were based on wrong assumptiosn or on insecurities or jalousy of sorts or whatever else of the kind that can make some react or act this way. Yeah, more liek act, as in the cases I think of, there was no reason for any attack to take place. Only in their minds, say. No reality check, nada, done to see if it was just a wrong perception or assunption ion their side. And yet again there are the times when all is fine for such a long tiem then kaboom. One builds up this whatever assumption cause the scenario fits their want or their patterns, simply. Oh well. See what I mean, abotu getting bored and tired of it all at times, finding it repetitive and not very constructive in the longer term, to try so hard to give every misunderstanding a chance. When I was younger, I woudl then take it that if someoen acted belligerantly, well, too abd, that did not interest me and oh well, and flush:) As an adult I started thinking it woudl be wiser of me to give it a chance anyway. Now that I look back on my adult life, I seriously wonder about what giving twenty thousand chances lead to. Just a lot of wated time so far, and comms dyign anyway out of some assumption built and established…that t be in the third email or in the 30,000th, it is just as bad, eh:)
How else can I interpret such a response?
Well, I would ask the person what they meant by that. Soem will take a malicious pleasure in saying "read it starting by the forst word and ending with the last", or such things and not answer you at all. Makes it even tougher then as if I then try and check and give feedback sayign I am not sure how to read somethign they wrote, nor how to "interpret it", and they answer this way, well, ladeeda…That much for being alone in giving feedback and tryign to amke sure *I* do not assume, eh.
>> On top of that, I might happen to really misinterpret and not be >> able to adjust to what the other says if ever it is way too far from >> anything in my experience, or if he does not even care to try and >> confirm or infrim the feedback and light my lantern. > If I sense that my meaning is misinterpreted, I usually try as best I > can to clarify, unless I get responses similar to what I have > described.
Again, at that rate, i.e. when soemthign is misinterpreted by another and returned to me not only with assumptiosn, but affirmations, building a misunderstanding rather than tryign to straighten things and meanings and interpretations and intentions out, I;d have ejected some last week;-) I still try instead… And yet in such cases,I do not feel like explaining, as the other will not even answer the simplest clarification about lighter stuff that misunderstandings and assumptions, on their side. Makes it feel like one way comm. which coems back to a-communication, at least from where I stand, then…The other might feel they communicate fine, but I scratch my ehad then…. Anyway. I’ll end up finding how I want to deal with that type of emails and seign if I want to change anythign to the old way or what. I already have enough rebuilding to do without having to rebuild from some new demolition stuff on top of it, I guess:) C >
—
KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
—
Response:
On 22 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words:
Ensuring that one really understood well, rather than jump to conclusions and stcik to those forever without any reality check, can make exchanges excruciatingly heavy and painful at times.
This has been a problem for me on occasion, both in writing and in conversing. I would say something that would inadvertently trigger a response of anger or vehemently irrational defensiveness toward something that had no direct bearing on what I meant. At that point, the exchanges would degenerate from communication to attacks, accusations, or silence. All this would occur without any attempt on the other person’s part to even try to comprehend whatever idea I was trying to convey. I truly have quite a bit of difficulty understanding these idiotic responses.
This in turn can lead to the one feeling like they are completely misread not putting as much effort in how the express what, in time, since they get the feeling it will be interpreted by the previously twisted out of any reality context fast judgements, and will not be see for what it says no matter how clearly they woudl express what they mean.
If I get the feedback I outlined above, I give it up for a lost cause. I refuse to get bogged down by what seems to me to be almost an intentional misunderstanding. How else can I interpret such a response?
On top of that, I might happen to really misinterpret and not be able to adjust to what the other says if ever it is way too far from anything in my experience, or if he does not even care to try and confirm or infrim the feedback and light my lantern.
If I sense that my meaning is misinterpreted, I usually try as best I can to clarify, unless I get responses similar to what I have described. — KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -KrosRogue (m…@privacy.net) writes:
On 21 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words: or said. A simple thing that correspondence does not always allow, in that not everyoen has the same pace nor needs the same space, where if one is on a more accelerated pace, being slowed down might bug them. And the same, someone with a slower pace might be feelign rushed into a faster pace. I never had a problem with "pace" in correspondence, and I certainly haven’t felt rushed. For one thing, I think writing is much easier than talking. I feel rushed when I am in a face-to-face conversation, mainly because it is in real time and there is pressure to find the right words to express my thoughts. I wind up not saying anything or worse yet saying something stupid. When I write, I normally write the way I wish I could talk. Now, if I could put a tiny keyboard in my brain… ;-)
Glad it works for you:) Yes, many find the written medium a way that can either help them express their thoughts better than in RL conversations. On my side, being a writer by profession, and even before that by simple ability, and having a verbal IQ that for its poorest result was a 180 and its highest a 210, expressing things is not a problem. Geting them through though can be as it takes two to decode and *exchange*, and make that exchange a real communication or a real a-communication. Communication is not just expressing, it alwas is receiving and decoding properly, where good communication also includes that what the other understood or interpreted is returned in feedback and checked so as to be confirmed or infirmed as understood for how the one expressing it meant it, where in good communication, adjustements are made from there to try and make our interpretation correspond as best as can be to what was meant, so that what is expressed is taken for what it means. Now THAT I find more rare, i.e. someone that can communicate as in "decodes, sends back a feedback that shows he got it, or that if he did not or only did partially, **and then shows that he/she can *adjust* his/her interpretation and understanding of the expressed thought in fucntion of the further information communicated about it in the feedback process. Many can write. Mnay can talk and write as easily, even. But clicking with someone we *exchange* ideas with is when that adjusting our interpretation (both ways) occurs with the minimum requirement of explanations, and most definitely with understanding the messages for what they are and mean more and more easily as one gets the idea of how the other is, through that good communicaion exchange in its first steps. After a basis is established in communication mode itself, then it gets easier to grasp how to read what is meant in the words written or said. Then pople feel like they are :getting through: to the other, that their side of the comm is really understood and taken as meant. Thta can ahppen to yet only be one way, wiht oen feelign they get through eaisly, as the other decodes and checks in feddback and ajusts, where the other can feel that they are interpreted without any feedback for checking how off the interpretation is and no shown will to adjust an interpretation that coudl be wrong. Getting through is not always about how well or not on expresses themself. It can be about how well or not the other adjust their interpretation, and how BOTH do it. Else oen way communication when tweo yet are exchanging, gets to be painful for one of the two, and sooner or later, for both. I find that most people will form a fast judgement and stay stuck in it, and will read every next word and thought expressed filtering it through what they wrongly interpreted the first time around. This leading to the second time around being doubly "off", as in not seing what the other is sayign for what it is and says, where that will too be added to the filtering of the third message, say, where that will twist all interpretations around more and more. When that happesn to me, I feel I am not "getting through" at all…Might be that I wrongly expressed myself. Might be that the other is already too far gone in his interpretations wihtout feedback checking done anywhere, or done too rarely. Ensuring that one really understood well, rather than jump to conclusions and stcik to those forever without any reality check, can make exchanges excruciatingly heavy and painful at times. This in turn can lead to the one feeling like they are completely misread not putting as much effort in how the express what, in time, since they get the feeling it will be interpreted by the previously twisted out of any reality context fast judgements, and will not be see for what it says no matter how clearly they woudl express what they mean. Some might say that they never lived that.Among, some might eb that never realized how the half that says they lived that lived it in an exchange with them LOL:) I do live that occasionally in my writen exchnages, cause I am not the only one communicating in my exchanges, the either does too…or not, i.e. he/she can be creating a-communication wiht the other in not checkign if he/she interpreted this and that right at all. On top of that, I might happen to really misinterpret and not be able to adjust to what the other says if ever it is way too far from anything in my experience, or if he does not even care to try and confirm or infrim the feedback and light my lantern. C
— KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
—
Response:
On 21 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words:
or said. A simple thing that correspondence does not always allow, in that not everyoen has the same pace nor needs the same space, where if one is on a more accelerated pace, being slowed down might bug them. And the same, someone with a slower pace might be feelign rushed into a faster pace.
I never had a problem with "pace" in correspondence, and I certainly haven’t felt rushed. For one thing, I think writing is much easier than talking. I feel rushed when I am in a face-to-face conversation, mainly because it is in real time and there is pressure to find the right words to express my thoughts. I wind up not saying anything or worse yet saying something stupid. When I write, I normally write the way I wish I could talk. Now, if I could put a tiny keyboard in my brain… ;-) — KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
Response:
In article <cg4kkr$ro…@freenet9.carleton.ca
, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Your Name Here=Harvey (y…@somewhere.not.aus) writes: >> In article <cfrh9p$ij…@freenet9.carleton.ca
, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
>> says… >>>Hi, >>>Not forgettign you…I am just in a rather inner mood lately, where posts >>>being silly for some offer some light distraction…wher I seem to not be >>>able to email nada lately. >>>Maybe in a few days, after I slept some more;-) >>>But will get back at ya, promise:) >>>((((((H))))) >>>C >>>– >> Sorry, but I don’t answer to the name of Harry. >> I have a brother who does that. >> Harvey >Oh, I am sorry, yes this cvould have read for you too as I have not given >email news ina century or so. To anyone in fact…. >So sorry, and will try and get to it. If I woudl have the certitude that >my ebox is not blocking mail, woudl be more encouraging….Does that >soemtimes wihtout any apparent reason and without any control of mine:( >But I meant KRogue, aka Harry to me,. and not Harvey. >Still, please read the delay appologies as valid for you, Harvey!:) >Chloe
Sorry to have caused any confusion. Harvey
Response:
On 20 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words:
Not a problem. She tentatively renamed me "Harry". My name seems to be a bit more difficult to deal with under certain circumstances. ;-) LOL:) Well, you won’t catch me explaining why L:) Besides, I never knew any Harry, if I knewe many "kros" LOLROTFLAM:)
Ummmm, no comment. ;-) — KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
Response:
On 20 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words:
I got your email. I didn’t know what to make of it. I hope you feel better soon. Ever tried to reply to an email fr the nth time and gettign to sort of feel like you no longer were answerign spontaneously, tired of retrying to beat the system..? Not rememebrign if you are adding this comment that followed a previous one on THIS actual reply or in your past lost one and so on, ending up makign total nonsnse the more you tried to reply?
No.
No????
That’s what I said. ;-)
Darn….!;-) L:)
Cold twist of fate, eh? ;-)
Well, that happens to em sometimes.
Yep. Email sometimes develops a will of its own. ;-)
I got stuck on it and did not want it to make the exchange stay stuck waiting for some reply of mine, wheer I then chanced asking for another email to reply to, a new one I’d not have tried answerign so many times. Simply,. I got lost in saying how I was not rather than trying to reply being me:) And my own long ssplanations bored my own self before I woudl end it and rerstart again and get stuck the same way, where….etc.
Oh, well, if at first you don’t fricasse, fry, fry a hen. ;-)
((((((H))))) ((((((C))))) ..:) Thanks…..Kind of ya:)
Fun, too. ;-)
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Tee-hee! ;-) — KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -KrosRogue (m…@privacy.net) writes:
On 20 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words: I got your email. I didn’t know what to make of it. I hope you feel better soon. Ever tried to reply to an email fr the nth time and gettign to sort of feel like you no longer were answerign spontaneously, tired of retrying to beat the system..? Not rememebrign if you are adding this comment that followed a previous one on THIS actual reply or in your past lost one and so on, ending up makign total nonsnse the more you tried to reply? No. No???? That’s what I said. ;-) Darn….!;-) L:) Cold twist of fate, eh? ;-)
I don’t believe in "fate". Thus it can not be twisted. Nor cold.
Well, that happens to em sometimes. Yep. Email sometimes develops a will of its own. ;-)
Definitely. If one lets it happen, even more so. It would be easy to let conversations go on tangeants and to allow thme to give them a falsified representation leading to a-communication. I guess there is plenty of that, and that finding to communicate then becomes the precious thing. Takes some doing, and sometimes, some not going a direction the basis is not set for "yet". Of course, most poeple on the net prefer hit and run superficiality with not really getting to know anyone, or not getting known. Some will even play learnign about the other while never reaveling much about their own person and ways and so on…Many actually hold for a way of exchange "mantra" that the key is to knwo the other and not let them know you. I donlt believe in that one myself as it then feels like control–for cause:)-. But still, some thigns sometimes require a sort of baic knowledge of the other to be there before they are talked about or touched or said. A simple thing that correspondence does not always allow, in that not everyoen has the same pace nor needs the same space, where if one is on a more accelerated pace, being slowed down might bug them. And the same, someone with a slower pace might be feelign rushed into a faster pace. Of course none of those things are at issue when two just want to babble superficially and not know (the) other(s).
I got stuck on it and did not want it to make the exchange stay stuck waiting for some reply of mine, wheer I then chanced asking for another email to reply to, a new one I’d not have tried answerign so many times. Simply,. I got lost in saying how I was not rather than trying to reply being me:) And my own long ssplanations bored my own self before I woudl end it and rerstart again and get stuck the same way, where….etc. Oh, well, if at first you don’t fricasse, fry, fry a hen. ;-)
Sure is an option. ;-)
((((((H))))) ((((((C))))) ..:) Thanks…..Kind of ya:) Fun, too. ;-)
Nothign wrong with healthy fun, specially when ""innocent"" and shared.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Tee-hee! ;-) — KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
—
Response:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Your Name Here=Harvey savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words:
Sorry, but I don’t answer to the name of Harry. I have a brother who does that.
Not a problem. She tentatively renamed me "Harry". My name seems to be a bit more difficult to deal with under certain circumstances. ;-) — KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net The one that Chloe calls "Harry". ;-)
Response:
Your Name Here=Harvey (y…@somewhere.not.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
In article <cfrh9p$ij…@freenet9.carleton.ca, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… Hi, Not forgettign you…I am just in a rather inner mood lately, where posts being silly for some offer some light distraction…wher I seem to not be able to email nada lately. Maybe in a few days, after I slept some more;-) But will get back at ya, promise:) ((((((H))))) C — Sorry, but I don’t answer to the name of Harry. I have a brother who does that. Harvey
Oh, I am sorry, yes this cvould have read for you too as I have not given email news ina century or so. To anyone in fact…. So sorry, and will try and get to it. If I woudl have the certitude that my ebox is not blocking mail, woudl be more encouraging….Does that soemtimes wihtout any apparent reason and without any control of mine:( But I meant KRogue, aka Harry to me,. and not Harvey. Still, please read the delay appologies as valid for you, Harvey!:) Chloe
—
Response:
KrosRogue (m…@privacy.net) writes:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Your Name Here=Harvey savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words: Sorry, but I don’t answer to the name of Harry. I have a brother who does that. Not a problem. She tentatively renamed me "Harry". My name seems to be a bit more difficult to deal with under certain circumstances. ;-)
LOL:) Well, you won’t catch me explaining why L:) Besides, I never knew any Harry, if I knewe many "kros" LOLROTFLAM:)
— KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net The one that Chloe calls "Harry". ;-)
—
Response:
KrosRogue (m…@privacy.net) writes:
On 16 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words: Not forgettign you…I am just in a rather inner mood lately, where posts being silly for some offer some light distraction…wher I seem to not be able to email nada lately. Maybe in a few days, after I slept some more;-) But will get back at ya, promise:) I got your email. I didn’t know what to make of it. I hope you feel better soon.
Ever tried to reply to an email fr the nth time and gettign to sort of feel like you no longer were answerign spontaneously, tired of retrying to beat the system..? Not rememebrign if you are adding this comment that followed a previous one on THIS actual reply or in your past lost one and so on, ending up makign total nonsnse the more you tried to reply? No???? Darn….!;-) L:) Well, that happens to em sometimes. I got stuck on it and did not want it to make the exchange stay stuck waiting for some reply of mine, wheer I then chanced asking for another email to reply to, a new one I’d not have tried answerign so many times. Simply,. I got lost in saying how I was not rather than trying to reply being me:) And my own long ssplanations bored my own self before I woudl end it and rerstart again and get stuck the same way, where….etc.
>> ((((((H)))))
> ((((((C)))))
..:) Thanks…..Kind of ya:)
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Chloe
— KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
—
Response:
On 16 Aug 2004, (Eleonore Beaudoin) savagely assaulted several billion electrons with these words:
Not forgettign you…I am just in a rather inner mood lately, where posts being silly for some offer some light distraction…wher I seem to not be able to email nada lately. Maybe in a few days, after I slept some more;-) But will get back at ya, promise:)
I got your email. I didn’t know what to make of it. I hope you feel better soon.
((((((H)))))
((((((C))))) — KrosRogue AT SoftHome DOT Net
Response:
In article <cfrh9p$ij…@freenet9.carleton.ca
, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Hi, Not forgettign you…I am just in a rather inner mood lately, where posts being silly for some offer some light distraction…wher I seem to not be able to email nada lately. Maybe in a few days, after I slept some more;-) But will get back at ya, promise:) ((((((H))))) C —
Sorry, but I don’t answer to the name of Harry. I have a brother who does that. Harvey
Response:
Hi, Not forgettign you…I am just in a rather inner mood lately, where posts being silly for some offer some light distraction…wher I seem to not be able to email nada lately. Maybe in a few days, after I slept some more;-) But will get back at ya, promise:) ((((((H))))) C —
Response: